PR and Online Dating: Part One

Here’s a lit­tle tid­bit about me: I was once an on­line dater.

I am not ashamed of my ad­mis­sion, nor do I re­gret my ac­tions. I made a few friends through the process. I also have a col­lec­tion of funny anec­dotes I can de­pend on to liven up pauses in conversations.

Earlier this year, I de­cided to re­move all my dat­ing pro­files, de­spite be­ing bom­barded with eHar­mony ads. (Clearly, their ads are tar­geted to peo­ple who have never dated on­line.) I did so for two rea­sons: one, on­line dat­ing can take up a lot of one’s time, which I don’t have much of any­more; and two, on­line dat­ing can be a hu­mil­i­at­ing process — your self-esteem can only take so many beat­ings, no mat­ter how strong you think you are. (There is a third rea­son I give when the ques­tion is asked by smug mar­rieds: “Yes, I AM still sin­gle and childless. Why ruin a good thing?”)

All this begs the ques­tion: why does on­line dat­ing have to be so hard? Before the Internet, peo­ple would meet each other at bars, par­ties or through friends. That was truly a WYSIWYG sit­u­a­tion; you could size up your po­ten­tial mate in as much time as it took to drink your beer. But that meant mak­ing the ef­fort to put on makeup, ven­ture out­side and spend time with count­less knobs be­fore you found a de­cent bloke with nice breath and more than two words to string together.

When I dis­cov­ered on­line dat­ing, it was like manna from the heav­ens. I could scroll through hun­dreds of men, in the com­fort of my home and pa­ja­mas, and delete the un­de­sir­ables with a click of my mouse. It was like pick­ing fruit in a gro­cery store — I could toss aside the dented, moldy ap­ples to get to the shiny, juicy ones. How can that be a bad thing?

But like most web ap­pli­ca­tions, it’s only as good as the peo­ple who use them. There are users who see the tool as en­hanc­ing their lives, e.g. in­creas­ing their chances of meet­ing a nice per­son. And there will be those who see it as a means to their ne­far­i­ous ends, e.g. how many women can I dupe, date and dump? You can prob­a­bly guess which group I en­coun­tered the most.

I was re­cently shar­ing my on­line dat­ing ex­pe­ri­ences with a girl­friend. Between the two of us, we ac­cu­mu­lated many sto­ries of, to quote the Lowest of the Low, sales­men, cheats and liars. We came up with some ba­sic guide­lines on how to de­ci­pher a man’s on­line pro­file. (For example, using “Tony Montana” as a pro­file name. Is it their real name or a shout out to a mur­der­ous, cocaine-snorting movie char­ac­ter? Answer: they prob­a­bly have a Scarface poster over their bed.) Conversely, these same guide­lines could pro­vide men with tips on how to best mar­ket them­selves. Then it struck me — on­line dat­ing is a lot like pub­lic re­la­tions! My co­hort didn’t see the con­nec­tion but I sure did. The idea may seem ridicu­lous at first, but bear with me.

PR is about build­ing re­la­tion­ships with your au­di­ences. It in­volves de­vel­op­ing a pos­i­tive re­la­tion­ship with the pub­lic, with the goal of get­ting them to view your or­ga­ni­za­tion in a pos­i­tive light. It also in­cludes build­ing a strong brand that will at­tract the right au­di­ence, in­still trust and con­fi­dence and help you avoid pitchfork-wielding mobs.

When post­ing a pro­file on an on­line dat­ing site, aren’t the goals very sim­i­lar? You want to build a strong brand (pro­file) that will at­tract the right au­di­ence (women). It should also be an ac­cu­rate and hon­est por­trayal of what you have to of­fer; if your brand does not re­flect re­al­ity or you can’t back it up with qual­ity prod­uct, your suc­cess rate will plummet. And you will be chased by pitchfork-wielding women.

According to Love Online: A Report on Digital Dating in Canada 37% more men than women use on­line dat­ing ser­vices. That means for every woman us­ing on­line dat­ing ser­vices, there are more than two men. So not only do you have to at­tract women to your pro­file, you have to com­pete with hun­dreds of other fel­lows at the same time. How do you make your brand stand out? I called it the 3H fac­tor — hon­esty, a lit­tle bit of hu­mil­ity and a dose of humour.

So as a pub­lic ser­vice an­nounce­ment, I de­cided to em­bark on a se­ries of posts on mar­ket­ing your­self through your on­line dat­ing pro­file. What do women look for? And what do your pro­file choices re­ally say about you? (My ex­pe­ri­ences with on­line dat­ing are lim­ited to men, so the fo­cus will be on male pro­files, ‘natch. Any male vis­i­tors to my blog are free to post their own mus­ings about women and on­line dat­ing in the com­ments sec­tion. Or write a post on your blog about the subject; remember to link to mine to cre­ate a lively dis­cus­sion.) I would also like to thank all my lovely girl­friends who con­tributed their own sug­ges­tions via Twitter.

Part one: The Photo

They say a pic­ture is worth a thou­sand words and brother, they ain’t kid­ding. This is the make-or-break item in your profile. It is what makes a woman de­cide whether to read your pro­file or block you from ever ap­pear­ing on her screen again. The fol­low­ing are the types of pho­tos com­monly used and why they give cre­dence to the old no­tion that pic­tures can steal your soul.

Standing in front of your car. It’s nice that you’re proud of your souped-up Honda Civic. In these times it is im­pres­sive that you can af­ford to drive, what with the high in­sur­ance rates and soar­ing gas prices. And ku­dos to you for be­ing able to get your en­tire car in the photo with you!

What it says about you: That sure is a nice sheen on your chas­sis but you’re so far away that I CAN’T SEE YOUR FACE. It also tells me you’ll prob­a­bly be more into your car than me. I ex­pect our dates will in­clude trips to the car wash, street rac­ing and a re­quest for a Tawny Kitaen-pose on the hood of your car be­cause you are more than likely a Whitesnake fan.

She'll put a shine on your chassis!

Tawny Kitaen, 80s video vixen. She’ll put a shine on your chassis!

The Usher Shot. No, I’m not talk­ing about the singer. It’s that one photo taken at your buddy’s wed­ding. You’re in a dap­per tuxedo and you look ab­solutely, in­cred­i­bly handsome.

What is says about you: You look good in a tuxedo. Big deal, most men do. But un­less you’re James Bond, don’t bother us­ing it as your main pro­file photo. Yes, it shows that you dress up real good, but what about the other 364 days of the year?

NOT YOU.

NOT YOU.

Group shots. Wow, you have a lot of friends. And they all seem to like you, you party animal!

What it says about you: You’re ac­tu­ally go­ing to make me look for you in the photo? Is this what I’ll be do­ing every Saturday night when you’re out par­ty­ing with your bud­dies — look­ing for you? In my ex­pe­ri­ence, men who post the group shot are usu­ally the ugli­est ones in the photo. While this may not be true in your case, that’s the first thing that pops into my head. Next!

Pictures with at­trac­tive women. Wow, those are very at­trac­tive women you’re with! You’re such a stud!

What is says about you: So you got a Hooters waitress/Budweiser girl/auto show model to pose with you. Sorry to tell you this, but they’ll pose with any­body. That’s what they are paid to do. And if you are such a chick mag­net, why are you on a dat­ing site? You can get women to pose in pic­tures with you, but you can’t seal the deal?

Dude! They are SOOO not going out with you.

Dude! They are SOOO not go­ing out with you.

Cut and paste shots. Aren’t you cre­ative! You’ve taken a pic­ture of your­self with an ex-girlfriend, cut her out and put “This could be you!” in her place. Awwww.

What is says about you: You think women are all the same and eas­ily replaceable. You’re also a big nerd.

The shirt­less man. You’re smok­ing hot. You must spend every day at the gym work­ing on your six-pack.

What is says about you: You’d rather spend time at the gym in­stead of snug­gling in front of the TV with me, a pizza and a six-pack of beer. You also spend more time in the bath­room than I do. You shave your chest more of­ten than I shave my legs.

You are a walk­ing Backstreet Boy video.

Really????

Really????

The trav­eler shot. Wow, you climb mountains, scuba dive and visit ex­otic lo­cales. Nice shot of you waterskiing/in front of Mayan ruins/snorkeling.

What it says about you: You’re never home long enough for a re­la­tion­ship. And you have no job.

Firemen. Ah, yes, 9/11 has been bery, bery good to you, hasn’t it? What a cheeky shot of you wear­ing noth­ing but your, er, hose.

What it says about you: You want a one-night stand. Women of sub­stance do not get a fire down be­low just be­cause you slide down a pole. (This rule also ap­plies to cops and mil­i­tary personnel.)

Firemen NEVER look like this.

Firemen NEVER look like this.

“Private” or hid­den photo. You have to send me your pho­tos first be­fore you see these goods, baby.

What it says about you: You’re cheat­ing on your wife.

No photo at all. You haven’t got a scanner. You haven’t had time to up­load pho­tos from your dig­i­tal cam­era. You’re prob­a­bly bet­ter look­ing in per­son, anyways!

What it says about you: You are a lazy, ugly Luddite.

It’s sim­ple, re­ally. BE HONEST. Don’t post any photo of you that is more than five years old. The pic­ture is sup­posed to sell you. Think of it as truth in ad­ver­tis­ing; we will meet you at some point — do you re­ally want us to be dis­ap­pointed? Do you want us walk­ing away think­ing we’ve been sold a bill of goods? Remember, women talk. I had girl­friends who used the same dat­ing sites I did, and we would warn each other about cer­tain men. If I only had a blog back then…

Here’s an­other way to put it: You want to sell your car and post an ad in Auto Trader. You are sell­ing a Pontiac Sunbird; you wouldn’t post a pic­ture of a Cadillac, would you?

I know it’s hard. A lot of women will flock to the gener­i­cally hand­some men who make all the above mis­takes. But be pa­tient - these women will be con­tin­u­ously dis­ap­pointed with “Romeo243” and “PrinceCharming4567” that your nice photo and funny pro­file will win them over. You may not look like Brad Pitt, but beauty is in the eye of the be­holder. There are women who aren’t sold just on flash and style; we look for sub­stance be­hind the brand - wit, charm and intelligence.

Coming soon: The pro­file nickname.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

21 Responses to “PR and Online Dating: Part One”

  1. Bons Mots says:

    Thanks, Jay, for the male perspective.

  2. Jay says:

    Fantastic blog, and from a friendly guy who is fre­quently us­ing on­line dat­ing sites, here’s some info for the ladies:

    No smile: I want a girl who can emote. If you have 10 pic­tures and not one of you is smil­ing, I think “She won’t be any fun.“
    Mirror Pictures: If you have no friends and have to take a pic­ture of your­self in the mir­ror you have big­ger prob­lems than find­ing a guy.

    and on the up­side, a cou­ple of things that I do look for:

    A goofy pic­ture: If you can laugh at your­self, then we’ll prob­a­bly get along re­ally well.
    Modest cloth­ing: I’m sure that you can prob­a­bly “bring it” when you need to, but your girl next door qual­i­ties make you a can­di­date for a din­ner with Mom and Pops.

    Thanks again for this en­try it was terrific!

  3. Sofi says:

    HILARIOUS!

    After two recent-ish on­line dates, I have called it quits 4 LYFE! I’ll find the guy at work, at a bar, on the TTC, at the gro­cery store, somewhere…anywhere that isn’t online!

    Somewhere where I can hear speech im­ped­i­ments. Somewhere where I can see self-mutilation scars.

    It’ll save me a lot of time, really.

    In the mean­time, there’s al­ways ice cream.

  4. Heather says:

    Bön, this is fan­tas­tic. If only on­line dat­ing sites had more em­ploy­ees like you!
    It’s a strange way to meet peo­ple but much less painful than get­ting set up with “the only other sin­gle per­son” that your friends know. Those ex­pe­ri­ences cul­mi­nate into some of the great­est dat­ing tragedies of our time.
    Online dat­ing has at least pro­vided me with a few dates, and a few free meals, which is more than I was achiev­ing on my own. I havent met the man of my dreams yet, but he has to be out there.….……somewhere.

  5. bonsmots says:

    You brought up a good point, Chris.

    I be­lieve that you should try every­thing once (with the ex­cep­tion of bungee jump­ing and heroin). I tried on­line dat­ing (more than once, over the course of sev­eral years) and de­cided it wasn’t for me.

    The ob­jec­tive of my post is not to scare any­one. I just want to man­age people’s ex­pec­ta­tions. Impart some wis­dom from my own ex­pe­ri­ences. Online dat­ing does not have to be a hor­ri­ble or­deal. In fact, I have two friends that found their hus­bands through an on­line dat­ing web­site. Miracles do happen.

    What I want peo­ple to take away from my post is an­other way to read on­line dat­ing pro­files; do not take them at face value. Use my sug­ges­tions to de­ci­pher the hun­dreds of pro­files you will have to go through.

    I do sug­gest you try it, if you haven’t be­fore. I just hope I made the task less oner­ous for you.

  6. Chris Clarke says:

    Bön, I fi­nally got around to read­ing this, and let me just say that it was both funny and de­ter­ring. I just got out of a LTR and while it’s still too early for me to get back into the game (and what a game it is), I’m prob­a­bly go­ing to avoid on­line dat­ing as much as pos­si­ble. Your ex­pe­ri­ences only helped to con­firm that.

    Do you see the irony in giv­ing ad­vice to po­ten­tial on­line daters and get­ting com­ments say­ing things like “Love this post — just an­other con­fir­ma­tion not to go the on­line dat­ing route.”

    I’m look­ing for­ward to the next installment!

  7. kerry says:

    What bugs me the most about on­line dat­ing are the folks who tell you about their buddy at work who met the woman of his dreams on­line and that they’re get­ting mar­ried next week. I think if crit­i­cal re­search took place, it would re­veal that every­one who refers to this suc­cess story is talk­ing about the very same guy.

    Meeting the man of my dreams on­line? I might as well ask for big boobs and a Ferrari while I’m en­ter­tain­ing that fantasy.

  8. Daniela says:

    What a fan­tas­tic blog, Bön-bon! I laughed at every turn, be­cause, like so many oth­ers, I’ve been there! As you well know, I used to on­line date for years. Met a few of my friends and a cou­ple of my boyfriends on there. I had to go on at least 10 hor­ri­ble dates for every good one, and I thought I was be­ing dis­cern­ing in my as­sess­ment of the profiles.

    Yes, pho­tos had a lot to do with who I’d click on at first, and then how I’d re­act when I met them in per­son (de­pend­ing on how much they’d over­sold themselves).

    There was one guy who had an ex­treme over­bite that gave him a slight speech im­ped­i­ment, and when I met him I re­al­ized why all his pho­tos were ei­ther wide shots or strictly closed-mouth shots. I also learned that I was, in­deed, a shal­low hu­man be­ing. Mind you, I’ve had com­ments thrown at me like, “you’re heav­ier in real life than you are in your pho­tos”, even when my pho­tos were taken the week be­fore! This is what hap­pens when you post face shots and not full body shots… but then again, I date peo­ple of all shapes and sizes and the face is the most im­por­tant fea­ture to me.

    I don’t re­gret all those years spent on­line dat­ing.. it makes for great ma­te­r­ial and I may well go back to it some­day. I stopped merely be­cause I no longer had time to keep up with my count­less pro­files on Nerve, OKCupid, AFF, Lavalife, and even the dreaded A.M.

    Irony of ironies, about a month af­ter I stopped, I met some­one who is prob­a­bly the best guy I’ve ever dated. I won­der why that is? Perhaps I fi­nally had to talk to a stranger with­out re­veal­ing all my in­ner­most goals and as­pi­ra­tions or sex­ual fan­tasies in an on­line es­say be­fore talk­ing to him. Perhaps he could get a glimpse of the real me with­out imag­in­ing a skinny babe un­der­neath this cute face. Who knows?

    I look for­ward to the next few in­stal­ments of this series.

  9. prjane says:

    I found your blog via an­other PR post. I can re­late! I don’t use on­line dat­ing ser­vices any­more but I think if you’re care­ful about what you re­veal they can be a great way to avoid spend­ing time in bars. I keep that part of my on­line life sep­a­rate from my pro­fes­sional life. Aside from my friends, I don’t re­ally know who ben­e­fits from hear­ing about my love life, and I cer­tainly don’t want to know these things about my col­leagues. This is one of my prob­lems with blogs and so­cial me­dia: every­body thinks they’re just so damned in­ter­est­ing — but few are. Some seem to think that the more re­veal­ing they are, the bet­ter. I think the re­sult is quit the op­po­site. If you’re none too smart to be­gin with you’re not do­ing your­self any fa­vors by broad­cast­ing that to the world :)

  10. bonsmots says:

    Looking for­ward to it, Karin!

  11. bonsmots says:

    Wait for my next post to find out, Leon.

  12. Leon Wu says:

    Wait, so “Studmuffin69” isn’t a good pro­file name?!

  13. karinmk123 says:

    Funny you should men­tion eHar­mony as a dat­ing ser­vice tar­geted to peo­ple who have never dated on­line. I have been sep­a­rated for over 6 years and my di­vorce should be fi­nal­ized some­time this month. YAY!! Anyway, I re­sisted go­ing on­line cuz I felt it cold, im­per­sonal and a lit­tle des­per­ate. But all sorts of peo­ple kept say­ing how amaz­ing some ser­vices were blah, blah.

    So, I kept get­ting bom­barded with eHar­mony com­pli­men­tary date match­ing e-mails, and one day I bit the bul­let. Spent an hour and a half an­swer­ing 300 ques­tions and guess what?! Oh the hor­ror! Oh the hu­mil­i­a­tion! In bold cap­i­tal let­ters: NO MATCHES FOUND! No matches for you! I felt like I was be­ing served by the “soup nazi” — No soup for you!

    I re­al­ized later that eHar­mony is a Christian dat­ing site, and they couldn’t match me up be­cause my sta­tus was “Separated” which means tech­ni­cally still mar­ried, and I guess they want to shy away from any Ashley Madison shenani­gans or com­par­isons. However, this ex­pe­ri­ence left me feel­ing ut­terly de­mor­al­ized and I have vowed not to jump into the on­line dat­ing pool. Ever.

    Love this post — just an­other con­fir­ma­tion not to go the on­line dat­ing route. I have plan­ning on post­ing my thoughts on the par­al­lels be­tween job-hunting and the dat­ing process — and now I’m go­ing to just do it. Karin

  14. Andy Donovan says:

    Well I can tell you when I was in the game (hmmm…still hav­ing a hard time con­vinc­ing my­self I was ever “in” the game…but I di­gress) I tried the on­line stuff once or twice and much like most found it leav­ing me some­what wanting.

    I think it’s like any­thing in life — a crap shoot if you will to think that what looks good on “pa­per” will trans­late into some­thing that fits in real life. Something like find­ing your dream job on the first in­ter­view. I think any­one who has yet to set­tle even af­ter dat­ing for sev­eral years sim­ply be­cause they haven’t found the right per­son yet should be her­alded and not pitied.

    With that…and yes hap­pily mar­ried with triplets now…I love the ad­vice here and think that any­one still hon­ing their on­line persona’s should take note and im­ple­ment — keep on keep­ing on my dear.

    Andy

  15. bonsmots says:

    Glad to be of ser­vice, Sarah.

    And I’m look­ing for­ward to your take on the sub­ject, Melanie. (Nice blog, BTW.)

  16. Oh God… so trau­mat­i­cally true… And a good part of the rea­son why I refuse to date any­more. :)

    Definitely go­ing to be post­ing my take. You’re right, it is at least a great source of sto­ries for The Lore.

  17. thatsroger says:

    I’ve been re­luc­tant to go on on­line dat­ing sites but know many, many peo­ple who have, and even a few that have got­ten mar­ried as a re­sult. Welcome to the world of http://​jdate​.com There was even a play called Jewtopia about the fab­u­lous world of Jewish on­line dat­ing. When the site used to be open for all to view, my best friend and my­self would browse through the pro­files and know about half of them per­son­ally and they were all, shall we say not hon­est in their “look­ing for a se­ri­ous re­la­tion­ship” bio.

    And now you have just con­firmed my decision.

  18. bonsmots says:

    Brenda: you were one of the lucky ones!

    Rayanne: I was into on­line dat­ing for a long time. We’ll trade hor­ror sto­ries this week­end. :)

  19. Brenda Hampton says:

    Love it!

  20. Haha, this is amaz­ing. I’m pretty into on­line dat­ing, Bonnie. I have been for too many years and I prob­a­bly will be for a while.

    A line I use in one of my pro­files is “If you have shirt­less pic­tures of your­self or ones where you’re stand­ing next to your car, I prob­a­bly don’t want to hear from you.”

    It’s fun, but frus­trat­ing. I bet we could talk for years about it.

  21. bonsmots says:

    I’ve been told that the mo­ment you stop ac­tively look­ing, you’ll meet some­one. That’s not true.

    I like ice cream, too.

Leave a Reply


9 − = five

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!